home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0511>
- <title>
- Feb. 20, 1989: Friendship Has Limits
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Feb. 20, 1989 Betrayal:Marine Spy Scandal
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 30
- Friendship Has Limits
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Partisan conflicts on the budget and John Tower's stalled
- nomination signal trouble for the President's era of good
- feelings
- </p>
- <p>By Margaret Carlson
- </p>
- <p> Honeymoons have a way of ending abruptly. One day it's
- roses and heart-shaped beds; the next, it's dishes to be done
- and garbage taken out. George Bush last week had to face up to
- the messy chores of governing and give up his notion that
- making nice with the Democrats could work forever.
- </p>
- <p> Since his Inauguration, Bush has been trying to keep intact
- the tacit gentlemen's agreement forged by his fuzzy call for an
- era of bipartisanship and high ethical standards: if everyone in
- power would just get along with everyone else in power, all
- would be well. A 51% federal salary increase would quietly take
- effect, the Cabinet could be swiftly and pleasantly confirmed,
- sleaze would disappear in a warm glow of mutual trust. If
- everyone would make the same rosy economic assumptions, money
- would be found to pay for the savings and loan cleanup just
- unveiled and the budget just proposed.
- </p>
- <p> Alas, Washington has gone all partisan on the President.
- The new mood stems not just from Congressmen's crankiness over
- fumbling their pay raise. Capitol Hill does not want to take
- the rap for the irreconcilable differences between what Bush is
- promising in his budget and what the Treasury will allow him to
- do. Nor is the Senate Armed Services Committee going to
- rubber-stamp the nomination of former Senator John Tower as
- Secretary of Defense.
- </p>
- <p> Last week Bush also got a whiff of trouble in what he
- promised would be a squeaky clean Administration. It came from
- none other than his chief ethics officer, C. Boyden Gray, the
- man responsible for vetting the nomination of John Tower and
- advising others in the Administration that they must give up
- outside income and jobs: Secretary of State James Baker, for
- one, would have to resolve the potential conflict posed by his
- holdings in Chemical New York Corp., a bank that holds a
- significant amount of Third World debt.
- </p>
- <p> But Gray had an ethical problem of his own. Newspaper
- reports disclosed that during Bush's eight years as Vice
- President, Gray made as much as $50,000 a year as chairman and
- a director of his family's $500 million communications company,
- while collecting his pay as Bush's counsel. Bush did not fire
- Gray, or even hold his nose. The President defended the legality
- and benign intent of his aide, showing the same kind of myopia
- toward one of his own that got Ronald Reagan in trouble. By
- midweek, however, Gray had resigned from the corporation and put
- his assets in a blind trust.
- </p>
- <p> Bush has an even bigger problem getting John Tower
- confirmed as Defense Secretary. Initially, it looked as if the
- Armed Services Committee would ultimately observe protocol: the
- President's nominee does not have to be someone the committee
- members would choose, just someone they can stomach. "Ironbutt,"
- as Tower was known in the Senate for his imperious ways and
- wait-'em-out negotiating style, would never win a popularity
- contest. Nevertheless, the hearings started out as a love fest,
- with the former chair of the committee receiving a round of
- applause at the end of his first day of testimony.
- </p>
- <p> Club rules required that the messy downside of the
- selection be glossed over. Sure, the twice-divorced Tower liked
- to take a drink and was frequently in the company of women not
- his wife, but that was his business. More disturbing was the
- fact that he collected $750,000 in consulting fees from defense
- contractors in the two years after he returned from serving as
- the Reagan Administration's chief strategic arms negotiator
- during START talks in Geneva. (The money was for "enlightened
- speculation," testified Tower, not inside information.)
- Senators who may harbor the hope of someday taking a twirl
- through the revolving door seemed inclined to swallow that one
- as well.
- </p>
- <p> Yet every time it looked as if the nomination would come to a
- vote, another sensational allegation surfaced. When the
- committee heard that one of Tower's alleged affairs was an
- encounter with an East German woman in Geneva, the security
- risk was too much to ignore. Last Tuesday the FBI was also
- called back to investigate allegations that Unisys Corp. had
- made a campaign contribution in exchange for a meeting with
- Tower when he was a Senator.
- </p>
- <p> Up to this point, Committee Chairman Sam Nunn, who will
- carry most Democrats with him, had not uttered a partisan word.
- Cautious and conservative, the Georgia Senator had kept his
- distance from the messy personal business. He had passed
- lightly over the conflict-of-interest questions and was expected
- to vote for confirmation. Then the White House blundered by
- giving committee Republicans a peek at what the FBI had come up
- with; Nunn was excluded. Annoyed, he announced that if he had
- to vote that day, he would vote against Tower.
- </p>
- <p> The allegations of heavy drinking were particularly
- troubling, Nunn said, since Tower would be "in the chain of
- command that has control over the arsenal of the United States.
- The Secretary of Defense has to, in my view, have clarity of
- thought at all times. There's no such thing as an eight-hour
- day in that job."
- </p>
- <p> Suddenly Tower seemed doomed. New names began to float
- through Washington: Elliot Richardson, Donald Rumsfeld, James
- Schlesinger. Bush intervened, inviting Nunn to the White House
- for a briefing. Reporters were summoned to the Oval Office,
- where Bush carried the damage control a step further by
- insisting, "I have seen nothing, not one substantive fact, that
- makes me change my mind about John Tower's ability . . ." To
- emphasize the point, Tower was seated next to the President at
- a Cabinet meeting on Thursday.
- </p>
- <p> This revived the gasping Tower nomination for the moment.
- But with Congress in recess until next week, there is plenty of
- time for new charges to leak out -- and for the snicker factor
- to grow. Tower's reputation as a ladies' man, which he took no
- trouble to hide, has become more laughable than scandalous.
- Even now, he flaunts his latest companion, who sat blond and
- bored behind him each day as he testified. Whether out of
- ignorance or arrogance, Tower made headlines when he jokingly
- threatened to fondle her at lunch in a hotel restaurant during
- a recess in the hearings. "Not here, John," she protested.
- </p>
- <p> In Washington titans fall not from a single blow but from a
- thousand small cuts. Few believe Tower could survive a "no" from
- Nunn. Even if the Bush Administration prevailed in a
- confirmation fight, Nunn could make life so miserable that
- Tower might wish he were back speculating in an enlightened way
- for the LTV company. But Nunn has been careful to leave himself
- the option of voting yes.
- </p>
- <p> Why has George Bush, who began his presidency by
- emphasizing high standards, found himself so quickly saddled
- with so many embarrassments? Part of the answer is that, ethics
- aside, friendship and political alliances go a long way with
- Bush -- and with the rest of Washington. If Tower does not show
- up in public drunk, with an Iranian arms merchant on one arm
- and a female KGB officer on the other, he may make it yet.
- </p>
- <p> -- Michael Duffy and Bruce van Voorst/Washington.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-